What is Rhizome?
Rhizome takes it name from plants such as bamboo, aspen, or ginger that spread via a connected underground root system. As metaphor, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari used rhizome to refer to a non-hierarchal form of organization. I have extended this metaphor, refering to rhizome as an alternative mode of human organization consisting of a network of minimally self-sufficient nodes that leverage non-hierarchal coordination of economic activity. The two keys concepts in my formulation of rhizome are 1) minimal self-sufficiency, which eliminates the dependencies that accrete hierarchy, and 2) loose and dynamic networking that uses the "small worlds" theory of network information processing to allow rhizome to overcome information processing burdens that normally overburden hierarchies.
Rhizome operates as the central metaphor of this blog, connecting the diverse themes of energy & peak oil (arguing that a rhizomatic organization is the most practicable solution to low-energy social coordination), geopolitics & terrorism (as emergent non-state actors tend to embody many of rhizome's organizational principles), to philosophy (arguing that rhizomatic organization is more compatible with humanity's genetic ontogeny than the currently dominant hierarchal mode).
Several posts that elaborate on the application of rhizome to human systems include:
1. Problem of Growth. A capstone formulation of why our societal structure is unsustainable, how rhizome presents a solution, and how to implement it.
2. Envisioning a Hamelt Economy. Big-picture concpetion of how a rhizome economy will function.
3. Creating Resiliency and Stability in Horticulture. A more detailed analysis of how to implement a hybrid-horticultural scheme at the level of the rhizome node.
4. Rhizome & Central Place Theory. In response to a comment, a more detailed discussion of how rhizome can grow amidst existing hierarchal structures.
5. Rhizome Network Defense. A review of a Cambridge team's analysis of potential tacticts to defend rhizome structures against hierarchy.
You can subscribe to this blog's RSS feed by Clicking Here.
Rhizome operates as the central metaphor of this blog, connecting the diverse themes of energy & peak oil (arguing that a rhizomatic organization is the most practicable solution to low-energy social coordination), geopolitics & terrorism (as emergent non-state actors tend to embody many of rhizome's organizational principles), to philosophy (arguing that rhizomatic organization is more compatible with humanity's genetic ontogeny than the currently dominant hierarchal mode).
Several posts that elaborate on the application of rhizome to human systems include:
1. Problem of Growth. A capstone formulation of why our societal structure is unsustainable, how rhizome presents a solution, and how to implement it.
2. Envisioning a Hamelt Economy. Big-picture concpetion of how a rhizome economy will function.
3. Creating Resiliency and Stability in Horticulture. A more detailed analysis of how to implement a hybrid-horticultural scheme at the level of the rhizome node.
4. Rhizome & Central Place Theory. In response to a comment, a more detailed discussion of how rhizome can grow amidst existing hierarchal structures.
5. Rhizome Network Defense. A review of a Cambridge team's analysis of potential tacticts to defend rhizome structures against hierarchy.
You can subscribe to this blog's RSS feed by Clicking Here.
Labels: Rhizome
posted by Jeff Vail at 1:51 AM
5 Comments:
You may have noticed that I'm re-launching this blog with a slightly different format. The name hopefully will reflect a renewed focus on what I think is my original contribution here--viewing everything from Peak Oil and geopolitics to economics and philosophy within the systems-thinking framework of "hierarchy vs. rhizome." Aside from this focus, you'll also notice a renewed commitment to publish original content every Monday morning. Hopefully the new format will better serve both readers interests and my goals, but suggestions are always welcome as this will always be a dynamic process. Thanks,
~Jeff Vail
I look forward to the more frequent posts, Jeff.
Have you ever read "A Basic Call to Consciousness" written by memebers of the Iroquois federation? I'm not sure about the various editions, but the one I finished reading recently included several papers presented to the UN in 1977, as well as other notes/essays. I found many of the issues addressed there similar to those that you address, though they were written 30 years ago. In particular their views on colonialization vs. local autonomy, and why apparently getting rid of external colonial power does not fix the problems. They also speak of 'liberation technology' which I believe I've seen you comment on using different terminology.
I haven't read "A Basic Call to Consciousness," but I've already added it to my (much too long) reading list. Any time notions of local autonomy can be placed in a historical context where the actors are consciously framing the issues in those terms, or similar, there seem to be valuable insights.
As for that reading list, I'm currently working through a fascinating book on Ando Shoeki (recommended in a recent comment), about autonomy and decentralization in feudal Japan. Should be a post derived from that in the near future...
cool, new format looking forward to the monday updates.
Ted
Post a Comment
<< Home