
Here's an example of the tendency to centralize control structures into a hierarchal mode of organization, from my post on Rhizome & Central Place Theory.

Here's an alternate mode of organization--a networked "grid," "lattice," or "peer-to-peer" structure of small, minimally self-sufficient villages, or "rhizome" as proposed in my article The Hamlet Economy.
The Xingu settlement structure seems to consicously model itself in the latter pattern. Heckenberger even notes that each village was surrounded by a buffer zone of "managed parkland," exactly the kind of fall-back, resiliency-enhancing production zone that I recommended for rhizome. Here's a link to a satellite image of one section fo Xingu settlement.
Did this Xingu civilization really develop a dense, ecologically sustainable civilization without hierarchal structure? Or did they simply find a new way to impose hierarchy without developing the signatures of "central places"? Was this a conscious reaction to prior abuses of hierarchy, or simply an expedient to survival in the dense forrests and poor agricultural soils of the Amazon? We don't know the answers to these questions at this time, but the research of Heckenberger and his colleagues suggests that there is still a great deal for us to learn from the past about how we can best live in the future...
12 comments:
There's a very interesting civilization that deserves attention with regards to this phenomenon. It spread out over nearly an entire continent was was characterized by numerous villages that while exhibiting some differences in size it is quite difficult to really describe one village as the center of the hierarchy. The civilization's vitality and distinctness could have been maintained even with the loss of several of its population centers, something which could not be said about most European nation states or ancient civilizations.
The villages were connected by a vast, lattice-like network of roads. It is said that the creators of this civilization were said to have filled it with a bunch of myths and values that sought to avoid or circumvent the concentration of power. It was also filled with some unusual views about equality, even though many people claimed this was nothing but a crazy scam to keep the villagers oppressed.
Of course, I'm talking about the United States of America.
I'm not trying to be entirely flip in this suggestion. Just suggesting that there is a rhizomatic quality already apparent in the United States that many people don't fully recognize. Sure, things might be quite a ways from your ideas of a Hamlet economy. On the other hand, the world is, in my opinion, experiencing a centrifugal distribution of power out of traditional centers of power via networking technology.
A dense network of villages still exists in the Amazon. And in the Pantanal, and the Rio Negros. They are not connected by roads, but by the river and its tributaries. Since the mid-1990s, the bolder permaculturists and ecovillagers have been venturing upriver with a new kind of technology transfer, while at the same time, the archaeologists have been coming downriver with tales of Terra Preta do Indio. Its a fair exchange.
I'm pleased to see someone has mentioned terra preta already, as that was the first thought that came into my head when I read the post (probably because I'm in the middle of writing a TOD post about it, admittedly).
More here for those interested:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200203/mann
(via http://szamko.gnn.tv/blogs/23075/Xingu_River_Blues )
http://www.uvm.edu/~uvmpr/vq/vqspring05/amazon.html
Given the recent spate of hurricanes, would a lattice-like rhizome structure handle natural disasters as well as a centralized nation-state? I'm no cheerleader for the Big B, but it seems like there would be some advantage in having a concentrated center of power to facilitate the distribution of aid. (When there's the political will, Katrina being the most glaring counterexample.)
Hierarchal structures do have superior capability to distribute aid to areas stricken with focused disasters. This, I think it can be argued, is one of the prime historical forces that supported the rise in hierarchal civilization--Chaco canyon is a textbook example: drought usually only struck one portion of the periphery, so by collecting surplus grain and distributing it to impacted regions, they justified (and created an insitutional need for) a central power structure. This allowed the Chacoan civilization to grow to much larger population levels than was otherwise sustainable, until a drought hit the entire periphery and the whole system fell apart.
That's the key: the theoretical safety net of centralized relief facilitates development that is fundamentally unsustainable in the face of natural events. When it comes to tropical storms, that means unwise coastal development. I think that a very well run hierarchal government can do very well providing relief to such unwise development, certainly better than it could do for itself in a rhizome model of civilization. The rhizome model would say "this location is fundamentally unsustainable for this level of permanent development," and not create the problem in the first place, though that doesn't help when we already have such a large sunk cost in this kind of development (sunk cost is one of the key barriers to any effective transition). Two key things to keep in mind, however: 1) the theoretical ability of hierarchal government to respond to regional disasters and its actual response are often wildly different, and rare justify the other costs of hierarchy; and 2) hierarchal governments' ability to respond only works, as with Chaco, when the disasters are nicely spaced--get a big cluster of them at once (and we must remember that they are independent probabilities, so this will happen eventually) and the whole system crashes far worse than if each locality had to take responsibility for itself...
Order Xenical.Cheap Xenical.Buy Xenical diet pills
Buy Generic Lipitor.Cheap Lipitor.Lipitor 10mg
Buy Acomplia Online.Acomplia Discount
Cheapest Generic Levitra.Discount Levitra
Purchase generic Propecia.Discount Propecia
Order Piroxicam. Buy Piroxicam Online
Buy Cheap Atenolol.Atenolol 25 mg
Buy Lunesta online.Cheap generic Lunesta
Order voltaren online. Generic voltaren
Purchase Lasix.Buy Lasix 40 mg
Sick of Red and Blue? Wear your support of neither!
http://www.other-brand.com/Political_s/3.htm
先物 写真だけの結婚式 電報 税理士 東京 カップリングパーティー ウェルカムボード 小さいサイズ フラワーギフト 鉢植え カップリングパーティー コンタクト ホメオスタシス av ダウンロード ホームページ制作 東京 ロレックス オーバーホール 決済 比較 品川 デリヘル マウイ島 上海航空券 子宮がん 埼玉県 物件 RMT FF11 RMT テイルズウィーバー RMT カラコン 激安 結婚準備 結婚式の髪型 アンドロペニス 債務整理 過払い カップリングパーティー ボーカルスクール ウェディング 時計修理 広島県 不動産 ピアノ教室 事務服 ホームページ製作 東京 名古屋 債務整理 部分 痩せ ボーカルスクール 名古屋 ボイストレーニング 福岡 順位チェック リネージュ2 RMT 大人のおもちゃ 小学生 動画 熟女 アダルト ダウンロード DVD サンプル 動画 RMT 信長の野望 RMT 盗聴器発見 調査料金 身元調査 身辺調査 不倫調査 人探し
http://cid-3816de2c6e018c09.spaces.live.com
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/hjhhjjj/
http://pumacat.blog.drecom.jp
http://blog.sina.com.cn/ashander
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/lilylily/
http://blog.qlep.com/blog.php/175733/271812
I like your blog. Thank you. They are really great . Ermunterung ++ .
Some new style Puma Speed is in fashion this year.
chaussure puma is Puma shoes in french . Many Franzose like seach “chaussure sport” by the internet when they need buy the Puma Shoes Or nike max shoes. The information age is really convenient .
By the way ,the nike max ltd is really good NIKE air shoes ,don’t forget buy the puma mens shoes and nike air max ltd by the internet when you need them . Do you know Nike Air Shoes is a best Air Shoes . another kinds of Nike shoes is better . For example , Nike Air Rift is good and Cheap Nike Shoes .the nike shox shoes is fitting to running.
Spring is coming, Do you think this season is not for Ugg Boots? maybe yes .but this season is best time that can buy the cheap ugg boots. Many sellers are selling discounted. Do not miss . Please view my fc2 blog and hair straighteners blog.
.thank you .
I like orange converse shoes ,I like to buy the cheap converse shoes by the internet shop . the puma shoes and the adidas shoes (or addidas shoes) are more on internet shop .i can buy the cheap nike shoes and cheap puma shoes online. It’s really convenient.
Many persons more like Puma basket shoes than nike air rift shoes . the Puma Cat shoes is a kind of Cheap Puma Shoes .
If you want to buy the Cheap Nike Air shoes ,you can buy them online. They are same as the Nike Air shoes authorized shop. Very high-caliber Air shoes and puma cat shoes . the cheap puma shoes as same as other.
polo shirts
ralph lauren polo shirts
chaussure puma
chaussure sport
chaussures puma
puma CAT
ed hardy clothing
ed hardy clothes
ed hardy womens
ed hardy sunglasses
Disaster recovery notwithstanding, the costs of hierarchy very quickly outweigh the benefits. State formation tends to privilege specific groups at the expense of the host society, with disastrous consequences: internal colonisation and external aggression. A complex class analysis is required to understand the unfolding dynamic, but it's clear that complex hierarchies generally take more than they return in social benefits.
Post a Comment